Thursday’s Planning & Zoning hearing is a big one, with three Conditional Use Permits (CUPs) on the agenda. (pz_10-13-2016agenda) Also, there will be a separate hearing for a septic variance associated with the Ivey Caretaker’s Residence CUP.
This is a CUP for an accessory building in Aspen Meadow. BCPOA does not oppose; in fact we’re not certain why a CUP was required in this case.
This is a CUP for a guesthouse in Flaming Arrow.
That in turn requires a modification of the PUD building envelope. BCPOA thinks PUD modifications must be approached with extreme caution, and must be judged by their net benefits to the public. In this case, the modification seems reasonable because it improves clustering and reduces visibility, without harming other resources like wildlife. BCPOA does not oppose, provided that neighbors and the HOA are also amenable.
This application is for a Planned Unit Development that subdivides a 40 acre parcel into three (a 2-dwelling density bonus). The site is east of the controversial Theken barn and the Brass Lantern subdivision below the M. BCPOA has concerns with the proposed siting and other features of the plan, and is working with the applicant in the hope of improving it.
BCPOA’s board unanimously agrees that the county’s handling of two recent applications strayed far from the letter of our zoning regulation. Our letters to the commission detailing the problems with procedures and decisions are below.
We hope that these kinds of problems cannot recur under the new zoning.
The following is a link to a petition to establish a speed limit on Kelly Canyon. It turns out that the speed limit on an unposted road defaults to 70 mph, which is obviously not compatible with the road’s design and recreational traffic mix.
This petition would go to the County Commission; if they approve (which is apparently likely), they’d direct an engineer to assess the road and establish a limit.
If you agree, please sign!
The county’s speed limit procedures are documented here.
We’ve published the results of BCPOA’s surveys on accessory dwellings and short term rentals on the Zoning Advisory Board’s site:
Accessory Dwelling Survey
Short Term Rental Survey
We had a great General Meeting, with over 40 members in attendance. Presentation slides are here:
BCPOA general mtg 2016
Bridger Canyon Zoning Updates Excerpts General Meeting 2016
I’d like to thank our board for another year of service (many years, in some cases). It’s great to work with smart, nice people who love Bridger Canyon: Sharon Erickson, Deb Stratford, Mitch Miller, Chuck Broughton, Fred Leopold, John Sackett, Richard Lyon, Drew Seessel, Gary Sager, Kent Madin, Phil Cory, and Kelly Wiseman. A hearty welcome to Mike Smith, who’s joining us.
Watch for the newsletter in your mailbox, or read it here:
BCPOA newsletter 2016 (pdf)
And don’t forget, the General Meeting is May 24th, 6:30pm at the fire station community room.
The May 12th Planning & Zoning Commission considered a Conditional Use Permit for a Caretaker’s Residence. BCPOA opposed the application. Our central argument was that, regardless of the merits of caretaker’s residences, the zoning regulation defines them as dwelling units, and the general plan requires 1-in-40 density for dwelling units. Therefore a caretaker’s residence requires density, and cannot be granted on a small parcel. (Read the testimony below for a more comprehensive picture.)
The commission rejected this and the rest of our arguments, relying on precedent, because caretaker’s residences have been approved on other parcels without regard for density (often over BCPOA’s objections), and the merits of caretaker’s residences for convenience and security, as perceived in Big Sky. Precedent cannot have been the primary issue, because the commission declined to include a condition prohibiting separate sale and rental, which has been applied consistently in the past.
The commission has not yet issued a written decision.
BCPOA written testimony: BCPOA Ivey CUP
Staff report: WV_IveyCUP
Supporting document: Ivey_CUP_Additional_Info
This document merges presentations from the last three public meetings on the forthcoming zoning update:
zoning updates 2016 PUD + general standards
See bczoning.wordpress.com for more details.
And here’s a sandhill crane from this morning, just for the glory of it:
Atlas Towers has applied for a 70-foot tower, disguised as a pine tree, at Bridger Bowl. The application is on the agenda for the June 16 P&Z Commission hearing.